Author Archives: Marina Hurley

Handwriting notes and to-do lists is still a good idea

Writing to-do lists on paper might seem a waste of time if you already prepare to-do lists with software. Project management software such as Monday, Asana and Trello are effective and powerful tools (I use Obsidian) and I am not suggesting we stop using them and go back to paper. My concern is that relying on software might cause a lack of spontaneity when doing research and in capturing ideas when working on other tasks. Well-designed paper lists and organised note-taking can still play an important role in project management and be used in conjunction with software. 

There are important benefits to hand-written note-taking that we might overlook if we decide to only write electronically:

1.  It’s quick and easy to jot down short tasks and simple ideas on paper

When we are in the middle of a task and come up with a good idea or something we need to remember, it may be easier and less distracting to just jot these thoughts down on paper. Having to open up software, allocate an idea or task to a project description, describe the task, decide who is responsible for a task and when it should be completed is time-consuming.

2. Not everything we write needs to be kept

Not everything we write down will be worthy of further consideration. Occasionally, ideas or tasks will become inconsequential or lose attraction if they are left for a period of time. If paper lists are reviewed every 1-2 days, items or ideas that are no longer relevant can simply be crossed off or ignored. While improved technology may allow us to collect more information, it can contribute to information overload. Using electronic tools to capture everything we have to do or every idea we come up with might mean we end up with huge lists of items that will all need to be reviewed at some point.


3. A paper list is easy to refer to and doesn’t need batteries

Using paper lists to record tasks and ideas is easy to refer to. Even with multiple computer screens it is difficult to keep more than 2 or 3 pages of anything open at the same time. You can also take a quick screenshot of your paper list if you need a quick backup or want to share it.

4. Handwriting can force you to summarise effectively

Note-taking helps to focus attention on more important items and reviewing notes is also beneficial for recall (Kiewra 1985, Kiewra et al. 1991). While note-taking by typing or vocal recording is effective and easy with software, what you record still requires effective classification for easy retrieval. If you tend to take too many notes indiscriminately, it may be difficult to later decide what is important. As the act of handwriting is usually slower than typing, we are forced to highlight what is most important. Therefore, compiling paper lists may help you to summarise important information quickly. Ideas and tasks that remain after reviewing paper lists can then be transferred to software.

What are the features of a well-designed to-do list?

Ultimately what works best for you will depend upon how you work and organise your time. I have developed the Daily Task & Ideas Workbook and offer it here free of charge (and no email signup). This workbook is designed to be printed out and used to capture ideas and tasks on paper, while simultaneously allocating the priority and stage of completion of different tasks. This workbook can also be used to help you identifying new tasks and projects. The workbook has two pages (Page 1 - Daily Task List and Page 2 - Ideas & Brain Dump) with the following sections:

Page 1 – Daily Task List.

ROCKS (Must do today); PEBBLES (Must do soon); SAND (Short, discrete tasks)

The three sections in the first column are used to record tasks of different priorities. I use the ROCKS/PEBBLES/SAND analogy where the difference in sizes between ROCKS, PEBBLES and SAND mostly relates to the priority of the task. The general idea is that you can only fit in a certain number of large ROCKS in a container but the container is not yet full as you can still fit in smaller PEBBLES. After you have placed in all the pebbles that will fit into the container, you can still pour in SAND.  I have adapted this idea so that ROCKS are the tasks that must be completed today, PEBBLES are tasks that must be completed soon while SAND tasks are the short, important tasks that can be completed in between other tasks or when you lack energy or time to complete larger tasks.  When your list is reviewed, invariably, PEBBLES and SAND will become ROCKS if they are left incomplete and grow increasingly important.

The three sections in the second column are used to record tasks that are COMPLETED; STARTED/ONGOING; and OVERDUE.  Personally, I like to highlight tasks that have been COMPLETED during the day as this gives me a visual reminder of what I have achieved and helps me to feel productive.

Page 2 – Ideas & Brain Dump

This page is designed to capture brand new ideas and to identify new projects, sub-projects and tasks. It also includes a section to record topics that need research and projects that need updating.

My recommendation is to use the Daily Task & Ideas Workbook it for 1-2 days then review the content. Items that haven’t been crossed out or completed can be either moved to a fresh workbook or to project management software. The Daily Task & Ideas Workbook can be downloaded here: version 1

REFERENCES 

Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review. A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32

Kiewra, K., Mayer, R., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology., 83(1), 120-123.

© Dr Marina Hurley 2026 www.writingclearscience.com.au

Find out more about our online courses...


SUBSCRIBE to the Writing Clear Science Newsletter

to keep informed about our latest blogs, webinars and writing courses.

10 stages of the PhD journey: advice from many experts


Designing, executing and writing up a PhD study takes a large chunk of your time and energy. Here is an overview of each stage of the PhD journey, along with links to excellent articles that will help you along the way. Some of the advice offered here may be specific to a discipline, country or university, or may be heavily dependent upon some author’s experience and background. Nevertheless, you are likely to find most of this advice and instruction helpful.

 1. Consider what you hope to achieve by completing a PhD

It is important to seriously consider why you are undertaking a PhD and what you hope to achieve by completing a PhD. Completing a PhD can be extremely useful even for those who may not continue doing research later on.

*   A successful PhD student will be expected to possess key research skills and knowledge as listed here: Researcher graduate qualities for the PhD by the University of Sydney.

2. Write a research proposal 

You might be offered a PhD project where the research proposal is already planned or you might need to devise a research proposal yourself, either before or after you have chosen a supervisor. This proposal and confirmation of candidature will need to be approved by your university’s research committee.

*   What is confirmation? – University of Melbourne

3. Choose a PhD supervisor

Some students have one key supervisor with one or two additional supervisors, while it is not unusual for some students to have three or four. It is important to remember that your supervisor may have many students under their direction, so their time may be strictly limited. At many Australian universities supervisors need to be accredited

*   You and your supervisors by the University of South Australia

4. Design your project budget

An essential project management skill when conducting research is the ability to effectively design and manage research budgets. If you need to request finances through a grant application, ensure you thoroughly investigate the necessary guidelines.

*   Developing a Budget for Your Research Application by Western Sydney University
*   How to make a simple research budget by Jonathan O’Donnell

5. Start writing in the early stages of your project

Don’t wait until you have collected and analysed your data before you start writing. Most universities encourage students to write about their project while they are conducting their research. Project proposals can be rewritten and methods sections developed as data is collected and analysed. Literature reviews can be updated and conference talks and posters can be prepared even before you have started to collect data. 

6. Consider the structure and the format of your thesis

Exactly how to structure and format your thesis will vary greatly depending upon your project, your discipline, your department and your university and your discipline. Always refer to your university’s guidelines for thesis format requirements. For example:

*   Formatting your thesis' by the Edith Cowan University
*   Structuring your thesis by the University of Queensland
*   Thesis Format Guide (PDF) by the University of New South Wales 

How to find completed PhD theses

It is always a good idea to check other PhD theses that are similar to your topic, have been completed recently and have been produced by your university department. You can gain a wealth of ideas about structure, size and overall thesis design.

*   Discover Our Theses Collection by Macquarie University


How to write a literature review

Reviewing the literature is important to assist your knowledge and understanding of your topic and integral to establishing your position in the academic landscape. Writing good literature reviews is crucial to show your examiners how well you know the literature and how well you are able to explain the importance of your project. It is a common requirement that you write a separate chapter as a stand-alone literature review. However, for those theses that are predominantly composed of complete published papers, there might not be a requirement for a separate review section.

7. Get feedback on your writing

In addition to your supervisor, seek feedback on different aspects of your writing from appropriate advisors: accuracy, clarity and brevity. Increasingly, projects are written for a variety of aim to get academic audiences so ensure that your writing is clear and succinct.

*  Getting Feedback – University of North Carolina (USA)

8. Learn how to publish peer-review papers

Increasingly, students are expected to submit a large proportion of their thesis as published papers. Not every PhD project can be easily prepared as separate papers; however, remember to look at recently submitted theses within your discipline and within your department to see how people have completed their thesis.

*   What is a ‘thesis by publication’? by the University of Newcastle

9. Submit your thesis

The process of submitting your thesis may include preparing additional tasks and preparation of paperwork (i.e. the Originality Statement).

*   Prerequisites for Submission by Melbourne University

10. Understand the examination process

Usually there are three examiners. However, the process of thesis examination will vary widely according to discipline and university. Broadly speaking, your examiners will recommend that your thesis be accepted without alteration, accepted with minor alteration, accepted providing major changes are made or rejected. Usually your supervisor will choose who your examiners are and you may have the opportunity to choose one of your examiners.

*   Thesis examination by Victoria University

An oral examination for a PhD is necessary in some Australia universities.
*   Guidelines for the oral defence of the thesis by James Cook University

If there are any problems...

Most problems with your project are surmountable and remember that your supervisors and your university are there to help you. If things go drastically wrong at any time, it is essential that you seek assistance as early as possible. There are people within your university administration who are there to help you. To help dealing with problems, document any issues as they arise. It is essential for you to have excellent time-management and record-keeping skills.

*   Resolving Issues by the University of Melbourne
*   Student Complaints Resolution Procedure by the University of Adelaide

and remember...

*   Be aware of, and develop, sound project management skills including risk management protocols to identify alternative actions in unforeseen circumstances.
*   Keep records and extra copies of everything: for example, data, thesis drafts, email, meeting agendas, fieldwork notes. Ensure you have excellent electronic version control of your documents and extra backups of all your data and work.
*   Ensure you develop and maintain a support network of friends and colleagues who may give important advice and help you deal with any obstacles.
*   Get plenty of exercise, rest and sleep.


© Dr Marina Hurley 2026 www.writingclearscience.com.au

Any suggestions or comments please email admin@writingclearscience.com.au 

Find out more about our online courses...


SUBSCRIBE to the Writing Clear Science Newsletter

to keep informed about our latest blogs, webinars and writing courses.

10 reasons (from ChatGPT) why science writers should not use AI to write their papers


I have written a few blogposts about the problems with using AI for writing. This time I asked ChatGPT to list 10 reasons why science writers should not use AI to write their papers. I thought it would be interesting to see how/if AI criticises itself. The following is verbatim:

My prompt: Can you give me 10 reasons why science writers should not use AI to write their papers?

"Yes. If your audience is scientists, it's important to make nuanced arguments. AI is a useful tool for some tasks, but there are strong reasons not to rely on it to write a research paper. Here are ten reasons you could use in a workshop, article or discussion.

1. AI cannot take responsibility for the research
AI did not conduct the experiments, collect the data or make the scientific decisions. The authors are responsible for every claim in the paper, regardless of who or what drafted the text.

2. AI can invent information
Large language models sometimes generate incorrect facts, citations, statistical interpretations or methodological details that sound convincing. These errors can be difficult to detect, particularly outside the author's area of expertise.

3. AI can weaken scientific thinking
Writing is part of the research process. As scientists write, they clarify their arguments, identify gaps in their reasoning and refine their interpretation of the results. Outsourcing the writing can also outsource some of this thinking.

4. AI often produces generic writing
Scientific papers need to communicate the novelty and significance of the work. AI tends to produce safe, conventional language that can obscure what is genuinely original about the research.

5. The writing may no longer reflect the authors' understanding
A paper should represent what the authors know and can defend. If AI introduces concepts, interpretations or terminology the authors do not fully understand, they may struggle to answer reviewers' questions or explain their conclusions.

6. AI can introduce subtle inaccuracies
Even when the overall text appears correct, AI may change the meaning of a sentence, oversimplify complex ideas or overstate the certainty of findings. These changes can alter the scientific message.

7. Confidential information may be exposed
Depending on the AI system and its settings, uploading unpublished data, grant applications, patient information or confidential manuscripts may conflict with institutional policies, journal requirements or privacy regulations.

8. Journal and institutional policies are still evolving
Many publishers and research organisations have specific guidelines about the disclosure and acceptable use of AI. Using AI inappropriately could create ethical or compliance issues.

9. Scientists need to develop their own writing skills
Clear writing is an essential research skill. It influences publication success, grant applications, collaboration and career progression. Relying heavily on AI may slow the development of these skills, particularly for early-career researchers.

10. Good scientific writing requires judgement
Choosing what to include, what to omit, how to organise evidence and how strongly to interpret results all require expert judgement. AI can imitate these decisions but cannot replace the scientific expertise behind them.

A balanced perspective
Rather than saying scientists should never use AI, a more defensible position is:
- Don't use AI to generate the scientific content, interpretation or conclusions of your paper.
- Do consider using AI for low-risk tasks such as brainstorming titles, checking grammar, suggesting alternative wording, summarising your own notes, or identifying awkward sentences—provided you verify every suggestion and comply with your journal's policies.

This distinction encourages scientists to retain ownership of the intellectual work while using AI as an editing or productivity aid rather than a substitute for scientific writing
."

While I agree that it's ok to use AI for 'low risk tasks', I do not include summarising in this category. Whatever you use AI for, consider it the first author or a co-author if you use it's exact wording or summary points.

© Dr Marina Hurley 2026 www.writingclearscience.com.au

Any suggestions or comments please email admin@writingclearscience.com.au 

Find out more about my online courses...


SUBSCRIBE to the Writing Clear Science Newsletter

to keep informed about our latest blogs, webinars and writing courses.

How to write when you don’t feel like it


There are many obstacles that can prevent us from being productive and efficient writers, especially procrastination. Even if there is a looming deadline and we are well aware of what needs to be written, sometimes we simply don’t feel like writing. And if we don’t feel like writing, procrastination can creep in, and we might put off writing until the last minute and then produce something that is substandard or incomplete.

Here are four ways to set you on the path of writing, even when you don’t feel like it.

1. Write intensively for short blocks of time

Set a timer and commit to writing for only 30 minutes. Thirty minutes of writing might seem achievable when you don’t feel like writing. Tell yourself that after the 30 minutes is up, as a reward, you will allow yourself to do whatever you want for one hour. Commit to only write for 30 minutes and make sure that you don’t do anything else during that period: no re-reading what you wrote previously, no stopping to google something, no telephone, no talking. Just write. If you find this too hard, start with ten minutes.

If you are normally a productive writer, 30 minutes might not seem like a long time, yet 30 minutes writing is much better than not writing at all. We can write a lot within short time periods if we don’t allow ourselves to get distracted, especially with other work tasks.

Avoid setting the timer for too long a period. Avoid setting unrealistic goals for yourself as you will feel unproductive and unsatisfied if you don’t meet them.

When you set a timer, try placing it out of reach so you have to get up from your computer to turn it off. After 30 minutes, stand up and walk around, print out what you have written so you have physical evidence of your productivity. You may find that you want to reset the timer for another 30 minutes and keep going. Ultimately, you may find that setting these short writing sessions allows you to break through the barrier of just getting started.

2. Don’t switch between writing tasks during a designated writing session

During your writing sessions, only compete one type of writing. Switching between different writing tasks will sap your energy more quickly than completing one task. If you are getting your thoughts down, just write freely and don’t switch to editing or proofreading halfway through. If you are rewriting a section of your document, don’t switch to writing new material on a related topic. 

3. Take a break from the computer: print your document out and use a pen

We spend a large proportion of our time in front of a computer for all sorts of work activities, especially writing. Periodically take a break from writing on a computer, even if it is for a short time. Try printing out the latest draft of your document and take it to a café or a lounge chair with a pen and a notebook. Edit your draft by hand and use a notebook to write fresh material. You might find that the change in environment allows you to relax yet you can still work on your document.

I always print my document out whenever I complete a draft so that I can see how my writing looks on paper and then plan what writing I will do for the next draft. With a paper printout, I can see my whole document at a glance, without having to scroll through a digital version on a computer screen. Moving to a lounge, or a comfortable environment, gives me a break from staring at a computer screen and sitting on an office chair.

4. Find a friend to write with

Writing is usually a solitary activity but you might it more enjoyable if you organise writing sessions with a friend or colleague. Try taking your laptops to a park or a café and set up 30-minute writing sessions followed by 30 minutes social chat. You could also read and give feedback on each other’s work.

And remember…

Avoid creating unrealistic expectations that create stress and reduce our work satisfaction. It is unrealistic to expect that we can be super-productive writing machines that can write anything, anywhere and at any time. Aim to write in intensive pre-organised, short blocks of time in an environment that is as comfortable and distraction-free as possible.

© Dr Marina Hurley 2026 www.writingclearscience.com.au

Any suggestions or comments please email admin@writingclearscience.com.au 

Find out more about our online courses...


SUBSCRIBE to the Writing Clear Science Newsletter

to keep informed about our latest blogs, webinars and writing courses.

How to give and receive effective writing feedback


Giving and receiving writing feedback is crucial to ensure that errors and oversights are detected. Typically, it is the experienced writers that give feedback on writing, which is understandable given that science writers aim to produce high quality documents. However, this convention places an extra workload on experienced writers while limiting the opportunities for less-experienced writers to develop their feedback skills. Giving writing feedback is important for writers with all levels of experience as it improves the ability to critique writing, including your own.

This blogpost explains the roles of different types of reviewers and steps you can take to provide and receive effective writing feedback. 

What do I mean by ‘giving writing feedback’?
Giving writing feedback is the process of reviewing and critiquing the writing of other authors and providing suggestions and advice on improvements. Giving feedback can also involve the reviewer editing. reworking and rewriting the author’s text to demonstrate how improvements can be made.

The different types of reviewer
There are different types and roles of reviewer depending on the type of document:
 
 There is considerable overlap in reviewers’ tasks and the role of providing instructional feedback will vary:
 -The manager / supervisor / boss may instruct how writing should be improved.
 - Co-authors may prefer a certain style or suggest how something should be written or changed.
 - The peer reviewer and examiner role often provide limited instructional feedback as their primary role is to assess and validate what is written for accreditation or publication.
 - Peers or colleagues may give useful suggestions on how to improve writing based upon their experience and background, and knowledge of your project.
 - Educators, such as myself, may give feedback on all aspects of writing through a teaching framework.
 - If appropriate, an intended audience member (reader) can provide feedback on how well the writing can be understood and satisfies their needs.

The remainder of this blogpost will not include discussion of peer-reviewers of research papers and thesis examiners.

Issues with the feedback process

The process is often informal and ad-hoc
Sometimes, a writer will just ask a colleague, ‘Can you have a look at this?’ then the colleague makes a few comments and gives it back. As this process is not controlled it can lead to a few problems:
- You may receive feedback that is not appropriate to your stage of writing. For example: If your early draft is a loose collection of ideas and you only want feedback on the overall direction of your topic, receiving instruction on punctuation might not be helpful.
- Some feedback may be out-of-scope, off-topic or based on misunderstandings. This can happen if the writing submitted for feedback lacks context, includes unnecessary details or is unclear. These issues can arise as a normal part of the reviewing process. Therefore, giving feedback on the feedback you receive may be necessary. Or it may be necessary to discuss the feedback with the reviewer to let them know they misunderstood you.

Some reviewers can also:
 - do too much rewriting for the author, which reduces the opportunity for the writer to improve their writing skills.
 - give insufficient or unclear feedback.
 - make too many comments and make too many changes at once.
 - consider themself to be ‘in charge’ and dictate to the author exactly what to write. This may be necessary, depending on the circumstances and roles of the reviewers. However, wherever possible, let authors use their own words and phrases to say what they mean. This is part of the process of developing an unique writing style.
- only focus on minor editing tasks instead of critiquing the meaning.

Many of these issues are not insurmountable or necessarily preventable and can get fixed during the editing and feedback process. However, effective communication between the author and reviewer is essential. If you receive any advice or instruction that you think will reduce the accuracy of your writing, then discuss these issues with your reviewers.
Steps you can take to provide effective feedback
Be wary of relying on ‘Track Changes’ in Word
- Avoid the temptation to rewrite to improve the meaning using ‘Track Changes’. This allows the writer to ‘Accepts All’ of your changes; they will then be using your wording and not working on rewriting it themselves. Instead, describe the problem and encourage the author to rewrite any problem phrases or sentences themselves.
- If you do need to provide example rewrites of sentences, use the comments feature within ‘Track Changes’ or create a separate document.

When giving suggestions on how writing could be improved:
- Avoid insisting your changes are adopted.
- Avoid giving too much feedback and making too many comments in the one draft. I once saw a supervisor’s feedback on a student’s literature review that was so dense and full of comments that there wasn't any room for the student to do their own thinking and come to their own conclusions about the issues raised.
- Be polite and respectful.
- Avoid using emotional criticisms. e.g. ‘this is crap’ or ‘why did you think this was a good idea?’

Critique – don’t criticise
You can make your feedback constructive, by thinking of it as a critique, rather than a criticism. I define criticism as concluding that something is bad or wrong with the writing and/or using language that makes the writer feel bad about their writing. Criticism can imply that the writer ‘should have known better’ and that it’s not ok to make mistakes. Whereas, critiquing is when you conclude something is unfinished, has room for improvement or is not ready for publication. Critiquing a document is a process that seeks to improve its quality by identifying both merits and problems and learning (teaching) how to solve these problems. What should follow on directly from a critique is suggestions for improvement and what to do next.

Attempt to explain why something is unclear
- Just stating something is unclear is often not helpful. Explaining why something is unclear is not always easy but it greatly helps the writer to understand the issue, it improves your ability to critically analyse writing, and it indirectly improves your own writing.

Don’t be afraid of being wrong: use cautious language
I always use cautious language when I'm giving feedback. If I have a suggestion or an idea, I try to start with ‘perhaps’. For example, ‘Perhaps you could break this sentence into two’. This allows the author to then accept or reject your suggestions.

As I primarily teach when giving feedback, I always give a disclaimer stating, “as I'm not an expert in your field, please disregard anything you think is not correct or appropriate to your project”. However, I do stipulate that if I find the meaning unclear, vague or ambiguous, to consider reworking your wording or perhaps ask your colleagues for a second opinion.

Encourage authors to critique your feedback
If the writing is unclear or not easily understood due to topic complexity, you may have misinterpreted the meaning and then provide incorrect feedback. If you encourage authors to critique your feedback, you can quickly solve any misunderstandings, you are directly involving them in the process of improving the document, and you may also learn to further improve your feedback skills. If appropriate, encourage continued communication after feedback has been provided. 

Steps authors can take to receive effective feedback

Provide a short document summary and project description
This is a summary, separate from the document itself, that can help the reviewer quickly understand the context and purpose of the document. A short document summary can include:
- Document type and audience
- Document / project aim and objectives
- Key questions and findings
- Intended place of publication
- Due date
If you are providing a draft, explain what stage it is – e.g. early or late draft. If the reviewer knows it is an early draft, they might not give feedback on ‘fine-tuning’ tasks such as conciseness and punctuation.

Request what type of feedback you are seeking
- For example: aim and objectives, main conclusions, check for clarity, punctuation or content of sections.
- A preferred turn around time.

Be wary of relying on ‘Track Changes’ in Word
- Avoid the temptation to ‘Accept All Track Changes’ as you will lose the opportunity to critique the feedback, rewrite sentences in your own words and make your own judgements about accepting any recommended changes.

Give feedback to your reviewer
- What was really helpful? What did you disagree with and why?
- Seek further explanation of any feedback that you do not understand.

In summary:
Wherever possible, try to gain experience in providing and receiving feedback. Also:
- Check with your supervisors or managers before seeking feedback from your colleagues.
- Don’t allow colleagues to ‘be in charge’ of your writing, unless that is their designated role.
- Don’t use AI to produce feedback that you are expected to provide yourself.
- Don’t assume AI will provide the correct feedback on your writing.

Let me know about your experience in giving or receiving feedback on your writing. any suggestions or comments please email
admin@writingclearscience.com.au


© Dr Marina Hurley 2026 www.writingclearscience.com.au

Find out more about our online courses...


SUBSCRIBE to the Writing Clear Science Newsletter

to keep informed about our latest blogs, webinars and writing courses.